<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Words is a Picture Worth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interfacethis.com/2008/how-many-words-is-a-picture-worth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interfacethis.com/2008/how-many-words-is-a-picture-worth/</link>
	<description>Dave Feldman rants about product design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://interfacethis.com/2008/how-many-words-is-a-picture-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interfacethis.com/2008/how-many-words-is-a-picture-worth/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Very thoughtful analysis. One question: does the line represent a threshold for word potential, or an average? If it&#039;s the former, then the &quot;photomosaic&quot; (popularized in the 90s) could be an issue. 

Perhaps there&#039;s another variable that could impact word potential, which I&#039;d call &quot;relative image complexity&quot; (and measured by a simple algorithm, such as &quot;Avg # of contrasting colors per 1000 sq. pixels&quot;.) That would potentially capture those images that cheat (i.e., images that are just collections of smaller images, Hieronymous Bosch paintings, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thoughtful analysis. One question: does the line represent a threshold for word potential, or an average? If it&#8217;s the former, then the &#8220;photomosaic&#8221; (popularized in the 90s) could be an issue. </p>
<p>Perhaps there&#8217;s another variable that could impact word potential, which I&#8217;d call &#8220;relative image complexity&#8221; (and measured by a simple algorithm, such as &#8220;Avg # of contrasting colors per 1000 sq. pixels&#8221;.) That would potentially capture those images that cheat (i.e., images that are just collections of smaller images, Hieronymous Bosch paintings, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

